ALEX Lesson Plan

     

The Tasty T-Rex: How can cladograms provide evidence about the anatomical similarities and differences among modern and ancient organisms?

You may save this lesson plan to your hard drive as an html file by selecting "File", then "Save As" from your browser's pull down menu. The file name extension must be .html.

  This lesson provided by:  
Author:Hannah Bradley
System: Dothan City
School: Carver Magnet School
The event this resource created for:ASTA
  General Lesson Information  
Lesson Plan ID: 35248

Title:

The Tasty T-Rex: How can cladograms provide evidence about the anatomical similarities and differences among modern and ancient organisms?

Overview/Annotation:

The lesson will begin by students accessing their prior knowledge of the anatomical similarities and differences among modern and fossil organisms by creating a Venn diagram with a partner, which will compare and contrast two organisms. Next, students will complete the online modules found at "What did T. rex Taste Like?" from the University of California Museum of Paleontology, which will explain how a cladogram diagram can be used to show lines of lineage and evolutionary relationships. Students will use a cladogram to infer how a T. rex is related to modern organisms. Lastly, students will construct a written explanation to describe the anatomical similarities and differences between the T. rex and modern organisms based on evidence from the cladograms in a claim-evidence-reasoning format.

This lesson results from a collaboration between the Alabama State Department of Education and ASTA.

 Associated Standards and Objectives 
Content Standard(s):
Literacy Standards (6-12)
LIT2010 (2010)
Grade: 6-8
Writing Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects
1 ) Write arguments focused on discipline-specific content.

a. Introduce claim(s) about a topic or issue, acknowledge and distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and organize the reasons and evidence logically.

b. Support claim(s) with logical reasoning and relevant, accurate data and evidence that demonstrate an understanding of the topic or text, using credible sources.

c. Use words, phrases, and clauses to create cohesion and clarify the relationships among claim(s), counterclaims, reasons, and evidence.

d. Establish and maintain a formal style.

e. Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the argument presented.

Unpacked Content
Strand: Writing (WHST)
CCR Anchor:
Text Types and Purposes
Evidence Of Student Attainment:
Students write arguments focused on discipline-specific content that include:
  • introduction that states the claim and acknowledges and distinguishes opposing claims
  • logical structure for organizing reasons and evidence
  • claims supported with logical reasoning
  • claims supported with accurate and credible sources
  • clear understanding of the topic
  • clear relationships between claims, counterclaims, reasons, and evidence with words, phrases, and clauses
  • formal style
  • conclusion that follows from and supports the argument
Teacher Vocabulary:
  • argument
  • discipline-specific content
  • introduce claim
  • topic or issue
  • acknowledge alternate or opposing claims
  • distinguish claim from alternate or opposing claims
  • organize the reasons and evidence logically
  • support claims
  • logical reasoning
  • relevant, accurate data
  • relevant, accurate evidence
  • demonstrate an understanding
  • credible sources
  • words, phrases, and clauses
  • create cohesion
  • clarify the relationships
  • claims
  • counterclaims
  • reasons
  • evidence
  • formal style
  • concluding statement or section
  • follows from and supports the argument
Knowledge:
Students know:
  • the difference between argument and opinion
  • techniques for selecting the best evidence (accurate data and evidence, credible sources) to support a claim
  • arguments demonstrate an understanding of the topic and state and support a claim
  • techniques for creating cohesion and clarifying relationships among claims, counterclaims, reasons, and evidence (words, phrases, and clauses)
  • writing style is adjusted based on audience and purpose
  • difference between formal and informal style
  • arguments follow a predictable structure (e.g., introduction that states claim and organizes reasons and evidence, body paragraphs with logically organized supporting claims, and supporting concluding statement)
Skills:
Students are able to:
  • write an argument to support a claim
  • acknowledge and distinguish claim from alternate or opposing claims
  • use logical reasoning and relevant evidence (credible sources) to support claim
  • demonstrate understanding of topic
  • use words, phrases, and clauses to clarify relationships and create cohesion
  • write with formal style
  • write with a predictable structure (introduction with statement of claim, clearly organized evidence, and conclusion that supports argument)
Understanding:
Students understand that well-developed arguments express a point-of-view and are supported by relevant evidence.
Science
SC2015 (2015)
Grade: 7
Life Science
16 ) Construct an explanation based on evidence (e.g., cladogram, phylogenetic tree) for the anatomical similarities and differences among modern organisms and between modern and fossil organisms, including living fossils (e.g., alligator, horseshoe crab, nautilus, coelacanth).


NAEP Framework
NAEP Statement::
L8.12a: Similarities among organisms are found in anatomical features, which can be used to infer the degree of relatedness among organisms.

NAEP Statement::
L8.12b: In classifying organisms, biologists consider details of internal and external structures to be more important than behavior or general appearance.


Unpacked Content
Scientific And Engineering Practices:
Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions
Crosscutting Concepts: Patterns
Disciplinary Core Idea: Unity and Diversity
Evidence Of Student Attainment:
Students:
  • Use evidence to explain anatomical similarities and differences among modern organisms.
  • Use evidence to explain anatomical similarities and differences among modern organisms and fossilized organisms, including living fossils.
Teacher Vocabulary:
  • Explanation
  • Evidence
  • Cladogram
  • Phylogenetic tree
  • Anatomical similarities
  • Anatomical differences
  • Organism
  • Fossil
  • Living fossil
Knowledge:
Students know:
  • Anatomical similarities and differences among organisms can be used to infer evolutionary relationships among modern organisms and fossil organisms.
  • Anatomical similarities and differences between modern organisms (e.g., skulls of modern crocodiles, skeletons of birds; features of modern whales and elephants).
  • Organisms that share a pattern of anatomical features are likely to be more closely related than are organisms that do not share a pattern of anatomical features, due to the cause-and-effect relationship between genetic makeup and anatomy (e.g., although birds and insects both have wings, the organisms are structurally very different and not very closely related; the wings of birds and bats are structurally similar, and the organisms are more closely related; the limbs of horses and zebras are structurally very similar, and they are more closely related than are birds and bats or birds and insects).
Skills:
Students are able to:
  • Articulate a statement that relates a given phenomenon to a scientific idea, including anatomical similarities and differences among organisms.
  • Identify and use multiple valid and reliable sources of evidence to construct an explanation for anatomical similarities and differences among organisms.
  • Use reasoning to connect the evidence and support an explanation for anatomical similarities and differences among organisms.
Understanding:
Students understand that:
  • Organisms that share a pattern of anatomical features are likely to be more closely related than organisms that do not share a pattern of anatomical features.
  • Changes over time in the anatomical features observable in the fossil record can be used to infer lines of evolutionary descent by linking extinct organisms to living organisms through a series of fossilized organisms that share a basic set of anatomical features.
AMSTI Resources:
AMSTI Module:
Studying the Development and Reproduction of Organisms

Local/National Standards:

 

Primary Learning Objective(s):

  • Students will identify and describe the anatomical similarities and differences among modern and fossil organisms.
  • Students will analyze cladograms to determine the anatomical similarities and differences among modern and fossil organisms.
  • Students will construct an explanation based on evidence for the anatomical similarities and differences among modern and fossil organisms.
  • Students will write an argument focused on the lesson's content by introducing a claim, providing evidence to support the claim, and using scientific reasoning to explain how the provided evidence supports the stated claim.

Additional Learning Objective(s):

 
 Preparation Information 

Total Duration:

91 to 120 Minutes

Materials and Resources:

Student Materials (per student)

Notebook paper

Pencil or pen

"What did the T. rex Taste Like? Module Questions

"Features Table" from the University of California Museum of Paleontology

"Cladogram and Data Table Special Assignment"  from the University of California Museum of Paleontology

"Claim Evidence Reasoning" Template from Digging Deep Into Science Literacy (page one)

Website for Online Modules: "What did the T. rex Taste Like?" from the University of California Museum of Paleontology

Website Links for Acceleration Activities

"The Tree of Life Cladogram" from the American Museum of Natural History

"Comparative Embryology" from ck12.org

Website Links for Intervention Activities

"Terms List" for online module

"Phylogenetic Trees" from Khan Academy on youtube.com-10:56

Teacher Materials

"Compare and Contrast Organisms" List (to be cut into 15 slips of paper prior to teaching the lesson)

"What did the T. rex Taste Like? Module Questions Teacher Answer Key

"Claim Evidence Reasoning" Rubric from Digging Deep Into Science Literacy (page two)

Technology Resources Needed:

Student Technology Resources

Internet-capable technology devices (iPads, Chromebooks, laptops, etc.)

Background/Preparation:

Student Background Information: Prior to teaching this lesson, the teacher should ensure that students possess prior knowledge about the role of the fossil record in providing evidence about past life on Earth. If students need to review this concept before proceeding to this lesson, the students can complete a WebQuest on the following website: "Stories from the Fossil Record" from the University of California Museum of Paleontology.

The students will need to know how to complete a Venn diagram for the before strategy of this lesson. During this lesson, students will be required to navigate to a website using a technological device.

Teacher Background Information: Cladistics is the most common method of classification, which organizes living things by their common ancestry and evolutionary relationships. A cladogram diagram makes use of the observable features of organisms, which can be discovered by examining modern organisms or the fossil record. This lesson will focus on using structural features to create a simplified cladogram, however, detailed cladograms make use of biochemical, genetic, and behavioral features as well. Cladistics can show the patterns of change in organisms over time and serve as a tool to predict the relationships between organisms. 

Prior to teaching the lesson, the teacher should print the "Compare and Contrast Organisms" List and cut apart the rows into 15 slips of paper.

This lesson was adapted from "What Did T-rex Taste Like?" from Better Lesson (a free account must be created to view the lessons). This lesson will make use of the modules created by the University of California Museum of Paleontology: "What did T. rex Taste Like?" There are additional resources and a teacher's guide related to the modules available on this website. 

  Procedures/Activities: 

Before Strategy/Engage: 20 minutes

1. The teacher should divide students into partners. The teacher should give each partner group one slip of paper from the "Compare and Contrast Organisms" list. The teacher can pass out the slips or allow students to draw slips of paper randomly.

2. Each student in a partner group should draw a Venn diagram on his or her notebook paper. Using the Venn diagram, the students should compare and contrast the two organisms listed on their slip of paper. For example, the students who received the slip of paper with "Shark and Tuna" would list the similarities and differences between these two organisms.

Note: Based on the students' prior knowledge of these organisms, the teacher may wish to project pictures of the organisms on the board or allow students to look up pictures and information using internet-capable devices.

3. After students have had ample time to collaborate with their partners, the teacher should ask the students to discuss the following question: Do you think the two organisms are closely related? Why or why not? The teacher may allow partner groups to share their response with their classmates. 

During Strategy/Explore & Explain: 45 minutes

1. For the next portion of the lesson, students will need access to an internet-capable technology device. Depending on the number of available devices, students can complete the following activity independently or in partners. Students will need to navigate to the following website:  "What did T. rex Taste Like?" from the University of California Museum of Paleontology. Each student will need a copy of "What did the T. rex Taste Like? Module Questions"

2. The students should navigate through the first three folders of the module and answer the questions on the "What did the T. rex Taste Like? Module Questions". Students should also complete the interactive activities while navigating through the modules.

After Strategy/Explain & Elaborate: 45 minutes

1. Each student will need a copy of "Features Table" from the University of California Museum of Paleontology. The students should complete this table as they navigate through folder 4 of the "What did the T. rex Taste Like?" modules.

Note: The online modules allow students to self-check the correct completion of their features table.

2. For the fifth, and last folder, of the module, each student will need a copy of "Cladogram and Data Table Special Assignment"  from the University of California Museum of Paleontology. The students should answer the "Special Assignment" questions on their sheet of notebook paper, using their completed "Features Table" and the "Cladogram and Data Table Special Assignment"

3. After students have had ample time to complete all five modules of "What did T. rex Taste Like?", they will demonstrate their knowledge through a written explanation in a claim-evidence-reasoning format. The teacher will give each student a copy of "Claim Evidence Reasoning" Template from Digging Deep Into Science Literacy (page one). The students should write the following question the first line of the template: "How can we tell what the T. rex tasted like?" The students will write a claim to respond to the question, provide evidence to support the claim, and use scientific reasoning to explain how the provided evidence supports the stated claim. Students should claim that the T-rex probably tasted like chicken because it was related to modern birds. Students should provide evidence from the information learned in the modules and their completed feature table to support their claim. Students should use scientific reasoning to explain how the evidence they provided supports their claim.


  Assessment  

Assessment Strategies

Formative Assessment: The teacher will informally assess students' prior knowledge of the anatomical similarities and differences among modern and fossil organisms by reviewing each student's Venn diagram in the before strategy. The teacher should review each student's completed module questions to ensure the students grasped the pertinent information. The teacher should circulate among students as they complete the online modules to ensure students are on task and are correctly completing the interactive activities found on the modules. 

Summative Assessment: The teacher will formally assess students by reviewing each student's answers on the "Special Assignment" portion of the online modules. The teacher should determine each student's achievement of the lesson's objectives by assessing the student's claim-evidence-reasoning writing using the rubric ("Claim Evidence Reasoning" Rubric from Digging Deep Into Science Literacy [page two]).

Acceleration:

Students can further expand upon their understanding of the concepts taught during this lesson by exploring "The Tree of Life Cladogram" from the American Museum of Natural History. Students can develop the skills introduced in this lesson by completing the Living Species Interactive "Comparative Embryology" from ck12.org.

Intervention:

Students who need extra preparation before the lesson can be given a copy of the "Terms List" in order to be introduced to the key vocabulary words prior to completing the online modules. Students who need extra assistance understanding cladogram diagrams introduced during the online modules can view the following video clip: "Phylogenetic Trees" from Khan Academy on youtube.com.


View the Special Education resources for instructional guidance in providing modifications and adaptations for students with significant cognitive disabilities who qualify for the Alabama Alternate Assessment.
Alabama State Department of Education